Travelers priced its largest catastrophe bond ever, $750 million from the new Long Point Re IV Series 2026-1, renewed its $1 billion Northeast property catastrophe excess-of-loss treaty at a $2.75 billion retention with terms and pricing "unchanged from the prior year," and let a $500 million personal-lines layer lapse (Artemis, July 22, 2026).

All three landed in a market where Aon put risk-adjusted US treaty reductions at 15% to 25%. None of the three was primarily a decision about price.

Key Takeaways

  • The retention held flat at $2.75 billion after a roughly $400 million climb over two years, from $2.48 billion to $2.79 billion in mid-2024 and $2.89 billion at the 2025 reset.
  • The bond's multiple to expected loss fell to 2.54x from 3.76x on the maturing 2022-1 issuance, and it locks that price through June 2030 across four hurricane seasons.
  • Severe convective storm and wildfire made up 99.9% of North America's $90 billion of insured natural catastrophe losses, so an unchanged attachment point is a larger retained position than last year.
  • A $500 million personal-lines layer was not renewed, one year after being broadened to all perils, while the segment's combined ratio ran 79.5 against 101.7 for the comparable prior period.
  • Aon logged 15% to 25% risk-adjusted US treaty reductions and 20% to 40% on property facultative, against record global reinsurance capital of $790 billion.

Three Instruments, One Attachment Point

Long Point Re IV Series 2026-1 provides up to $750 million of a $1 billion multi-peril layer attaching at $2.85 billion and exhausting at $3.85 billion, covering US tropical cyclone, earthquake, severe thunderstorm and winter storm across a footprint running from Virginia to Maine (deal directory). It carries an initial base expected loss of 1.38% and priced at a 3.5% risk interest spread, the low end of guidance already cut from an initial 4.0% to 4.75% range.

It is the eighth Long Point Re issuance and replaces a maturing $575 million 2022-1 bond, adding $175 million of net new limit at the same point in the tower.

Directly beneath it sits the traditional $1 billion Northeast treaty attaching at $2.75 billion with one reinstatement, on an all-perils basis covering hurricane, tornado, hail, earthquake, wildfire, winter storm, freeze and limited terrorism, with cyber, communicable disease and NBC terrorism excluded.

Instrument2025 term2026 termRead
Long Point Re IV cat bond$575M (2022-1), attaching ~$2.89B$750M (2026-1), attaching $2.85BUpsized 30%; multiple to EL fell from 3.76x to 2.54x
Northeast property cat XoL$1B xs $2.75B retention, one reinstatement$1B xs $2.75B retention, one reinstatementUnchanged; retention discipline held against a softer market
Personal-lines cat XoL$500M layer, $1B retention, all perilsNot renewedDropped; capital and margin absorb the exposure instead

That retention is the product of a multi-year climb. Travelers lifted the comparable Long Point Re attachment from $2.48 billion to $2.79 billion in mid-2024, then to $2.89 billion at the 2025 reset, roughly $400 million upward over two years before this year's hold. A carrier that has raised its retained-loss threshold every year and then stops, in a year when everyone is being handed cheaper protection, is choosing that rather than drifting into it.

A Four-Year Price and a One-Year Price Are Different Decisions

The two instruments solve different problems, which is why one was upsized and the other frozen. A cat bond is a four-year commitment, here running to June 2030, so its pricing is locked for the life of the note regardless of where the traditional market goes. The 2026-1 spread-to-expected-loss multiple came in near 2.54x, down from about 3.76x on the maturing 2022-1, a compression reflecting the same capital glut softening treaty pricing.

Travelers used the soft cycle to buy more limit at a structurally cheaper multiple and lock it in across four hurricane seasons.

The one-year treaty resets annually, so a cedant wanting this year's rate cut on that layer simply asks for it next renewal, with no multi-year commitment. That is why holding the retention flat is the more informative move. There were two straightforward ways to bank the softening: buy the $1 billion layer down to a lower attachment at a discount, or keep the attachment and pay less for the same protection. Neither reduced retained catastrophe exposure. Terms and retention stayed put, so whatever premium relief the treaty captured went to earnings or elsewhere in the tower rather than into lowering the point where Travelers' own capital starts absorbing Northeast losses.

The market on offer was not marginal. Aon put risk-adjusted reductions at 15% to 25% on US property catastrophe treaty and 20% to 40% on property facultative, against record global reinsurance capital of $790 billion at March 31, 2026, with demand up more than 10% (Aon). Gallagher Re logged North American property cat reductions of 20% to 25% or more for the best-performing accounts, catastrophe rates broadly down 10% to 20% for loss-free cedants, and non-marine retrocession down 5% to 10%.

A cedant facing that has three levers: same limit for less, more limit for the same spend, or hold everything and let the savings reach net income. Travelers pulled the second on the multi-year bond and, on the public disclosure, the third on the annual treaty. Expand where the price is locked for years, hold flat where it resets, is a specific reading of a soft market, and it cuts against the instinct that cheaper reinsurance mechanically buys a lower retention everywhere.

The Same Dollar Retention Is a Larger Position Than It Was

The treaty's peril list reads like a hurricane program that accreted perils over time, and the loss mix underneath it has moved decisively. Swiss Re Institute found wildfires, severe convective storms and floods together produced a record 92% of global insured natural catastrophe losses in 2025, with severe convective storm alone near $51 billion globally, the third-costliest year for the peril after 2023 and 2024 (Swiss Re).

In North America, wildfire and severe convective storm made up 99.9% of the region's $90 billion of insured losses, squeezing every other category out of the data. Aon put roughly $27 billion of US severe convective storm insured losses in the first half of 2026 alone, and secondary perils now dominate the global mix.

So an attachment point calibrated mainly against hurricane landfall probability is being tested by a peril that no longer rounds to zero in the loss triangle. Holding $2.75 billion flat while severe convective storm frequency and severity both trend up is a more aggressive retained-volatility posture in 2026 than the identical figure represented in 2025, with no treaty language changed.

Nothing about the capital position forced it. Travelers reported second-quarter net income of $2.21 billion, up 46% from $1.51 billion, with pretax catastrophe losses of $518 million against $927 million and first-half losses of $1.28 billion against $3.19 billion, on a companywide combined ratio of 83.6 (Insurance Journal). Personal Insurance posted a 79.5 combined ratio against 101.7 for the comparable prior period, with segment income of $827 million versus $534 million and segment catastrophe losses of $276 million against $554 million, which is the arithmetic behind letting the $500 million supplemental layer lapse.

A carrier with those numbers could have bought its retention down on affordability alone. It held instead and returned $1.58 billion to shareholders in the quarter, $1.31 billion of it in repurchases. That is the tell. A retention states how much volatility a balance sheet absorbs before reinsurance pays, and buying one down because rate-on-line fell, absent an independent view that the retained layer had become mispriced against its own loss potential, sets the number off the wrong variable. The peril mix moved this year. The attachment point did not.

Further Reading

Sources